|
Post by redangel121 on Feb 17, 2015 23:40:48 GMT -5
WOW! 26 mappers! This is going to take some time to work out. How do you all think we are going to get it done? I have already heard some great ideas about splitting up the maps in different ways to different judges. The selfish me still wants to judge all the maps submitted tho. Anyone have any really good ideas on how we are going to get this done? And are we still limited to one week to judge all the maps?
|
|
|
Post by NIN-Kitsune on Feb 18, 2015 1:07:40 GMT -5
Considering the extraordinary number of mappers which was a complete surprise, I think it would be worth to make an extension of the judgement period to ensure quality judgement of quality maps, it was completely unforeseen how much activity has occurred! I'm glad to see Quake 2's glory days are continuing strong thanks to all who continue to dedicate such tireless effort! This is the big ten in terms of the contests, nothing should be done hastily, but thoroughly to ensure it's truly the best mapping event yet!
|
|
Null
Gladiator
Posts: 555
|
Post by Null on Feb 18, 2015 1:15:07 GMT -5
To streamline the rating process I recently had someone suggest the following procedure. Feel free to openly share your opinions and impressions. Also if you can come up with your own speed checklist please feel free to share it. I'm willing to listen to all creative suggestions because indeed we have quite a task ahead of us
|
|
|
Post by MaRiNe [Q2C] on Mar 12, 2015 6:33:30 GMT -5
I wouldn't have a problem judging 26+ maps and I would like to be able to give a rating to them all (as opposed to splitting judges up or anything like that), but if push comes to shove and we're having trouble, I vote for extending the deadline a little bit for all the maps to be judged.
|
|