|
Post by Sabotuer [Q2C] on Apr 6, 2006 9:33:11 GMT -5
Ok, I play it a whole lot, actually I play it more then quake 2 I play under the name of [PPG]Narrarator (PPG for PowerPuff Girls and Narrarator for the narrarator at the show )! I play a lot of ctf so I started to make a ctf map, but I don't know how to map for q3 (I use qoole and it doesn't support q3). It's going pretty good and I think it would play well. I don't know about it's play in q2 ctf but I think it's ok! It would be good for a dm if it was like that Now my question is this: Can anyone convert the map for q3ctf for me?
|
|
|
Post by AAAGGHHH!! on Apr 6, 2006 13:19:16 GMT -5
Ok, I play it a whole lot, actually I play it more then quake 2 I play under the name of [PPG]Narrarator .... Hey man just wanted to let you know it's actually spelled narrator here www.m-w.com/dictionary/narrator hehe.. This is a great site with a thesarus as well. It even says the words out loud for you to hear. But you guys do pretty good English anyways! ..and well, frag on in any quake man! It's cool u still hang with us Q2 guys when you can! Hell, I'm gonna play Q4 multi when I get the new comp.
|
|
Rab,d
Light Guard
Posts: 29
|
Post by Rab,d on Apr 7, 2006 6:40:03 GMT -5
Ok, I play it a whole lot, actually I play it more then quake 2 I play under the name of [PPG]Narrarator (PPG for PowerPuff Girls and Narrarator for the narrarator at the show )! I play a lot of ctf so I started to make a ctf map, but I don't know how to map for q3 (I use qoole and it doesn't support q3). It's going pretty good and I think it would play well. I don't know about it's play in q2 ctf but I think it's ok! It would be good for a dm if it was like that Now my question is this: Can anyone convert the map for q3ctf for me? Quark 6.5 supports Quake3 mapping. imo, it's better than Qoole, anyhow.
|
|
|
Post by tIKi_mAn on Apr 28, 2006 18:28:25 GMT -5
booooooo looollolol. gtk radiant 1.2.13 ftw.
|
|
|
Post by Paril on Jul 13, 2006 10:26:06 GMT -5
Radiant is useless.
End of story.
|
|
Derimok
Quake 2 Mapping Club
Posts: 198
|
Post by Derimok on Jul 13, 2006 19:23:11 GMT -5
Jester uses radient, that must mean hes useless! ;D
*pushes Jester into some lava*
|
|
|
Post by Paril on Jul 14, 2006 0:51:25 GMT -5
I said Radiant, not people using Radiant. >>;;;;
|
|
|
Post by grieve[Q2C] on Jul 14, 2006 4:17:10 GMT -5
;D
fried f13nd anyone ?
|
|
|
Post by Paril on Jul 14, 2006 5:23:00 GMT -5
Haha.
|
|
|
Post by 3fing3redfi3nd on Jul 15, 2006 12:08:14 GMT -5
/me reaches from the fiery depths and pulls all involved in this thread in with him
|
|
|
Post by Paril on Jul 16, 2006 12:55:11 GMT -5
..Except me. I can't be condemned. I am uber. I am.. XIERO WHEE
|
|
|
Post by draxi on Jul 23, 2006 14:48:23 GMT -5
Radiant rocks!.. QuArK looks like trow-up compared..
|
|
Derimok
Quake 2 Mapping Club
Posts: 198
|
Post by Derimok on Jul 23, 2006 21:41:48 GMT -5
I havnt really used radient, but Quark seems to do the trick for me, if i ever release a quake 2 map
|
|
|
Post by Paril on Jul 24, 2006 12:52:04 GMT -5
It's because Radiant is more for people who can stand confusement. QuArK is a beginner o advanced editor, depending on what you're trying to do.
|
|
|
Post by Wixen1 [Q2C] on Jul 24, 2006 15:48:12 GMT -5
|
|